Examiner John Francis Wojton has allowed 28 of 54 decided applications (52%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
John Francis Wojton maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit. Across 54 disposed applications, he allowed 28 and abandoned 26, yielding an allowance rate of 52%. This rate reflects the outcome of decided cases—allowed and abandoned applications combined—and excludes any pending matters. The figure is computed from the examiner's aggregated work across all art units in his portfolio.
This pooled record aggregates all art units under the examiner's assignment. Aggregate allowance rates describe the examiner's historical performance across his entire portfolio and are not predictions of outcomes in any specific application. Different art units may have different subject matter, applicant bases, and application complexity. Pooled figures smooth these variations and offer a broad view of past dispositions, not a forecast of future results.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 31 decided applications with an interview and 23 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner John Francis Wojton has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 54 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP