Examiner John Moore Jain Macilwinen has allowed 7 of 24 decided applications (29%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
John Moore Jain Macilwinen holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 24 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 7 and abandoned 17. The allowance rate is 29% over the 24 decided applications. This pooled record spans a single art unit. The figures describe the examiner's historical dispositions and are not predictions about any specific application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units in TC 2100. Pooled allowance rates describe past outcomes across potentially different subject areas within the technology center and are correlational only—they do not predict outcomes in any individual application. Each application presents distinct facts and claims.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner John Moore Jain Macilwinen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 24 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP