LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JOHN MOORE JAIN MACILWINEN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner John Moore Jain Macilwinen

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 24 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner John Moore Jain Macilwinen has allowed 7 of 24 decided applications (29%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

29% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

John Moore Jain Macilwinen holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 24 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 7 and abandoned 17. The allowance rate is 29% over the 24 decided applications. This pooled record spans a single art unit. The figures describe the examiner's historical dispositions and are not predictions about any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units in TC 2100. Pooled allowance rates describe past outcomes across potentially different subject areas within the technology center and are correlational only—they do not predict outcomes in any individual application. Each application presents distinct facts and claims.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2142
24 APPS · 29% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

29% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 45%
DISPOSITION7 / 17 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION43.3 moart unit avg 30.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY60.6 moart unit avg 48.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner John Moore Jain Macilwinen

  • What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 29%, calculated from 7 allowed applications and 17 abandoned applications (24 total decided). This is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction for any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    The examiner's record spans 1 art unit within TC 2100.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate tell me?
    The pooled rate describes the examiner's past dispositions across all assigned art units and reflects historical outcomes only. It does not indicate how any future application will be examined or decided.
  • How many applications has this examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed of 24 applications, comprising 7 allowances and 17 abandonments.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner John Moore Jain Macilwinen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 24 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP