LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JOHN ROBERT DAKITA EWALD
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner John Robert Dakita Ewald

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 24 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner John Robert Dakita Ewald has allowed 19 of 24 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

79% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Patent Examiner John Robert Dakita Ewald maintains a public record across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's allowance rate, calculated from 24 disposed applications, stands at 79%. This means that of applications decided (allowed or abandoned), 79% were allowed. The examiner has processed a total of 57 applications, with 19 allowed, 5 abandoned, and 24 disposed. The remaining applications remain pending. This pooled record reflects the examiner's overall output and rates across all assigned art units.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record pools all art units under Examiner Ewald's jurisdiction and presents aggregate figures. The allowance rate of 79% describes the past distribution of decided applications—allowed versus abandoned—and reflects historical output only. Aggregate figures do not constitute predictions of outcomes for any specific application. Individual art units may show different rates and activity levels; pooled data combines them into a single overall profile.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2199
57 APPS · 79% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines software engineering, and program control and execution.

79% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 73%
DISPOSITION19 / 5 / 33allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION30.2 moart unit avg 25.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY41.2 moart unit avg 41.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility40% · art unit 48%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)67%
§103 — Obviousness98% · art unit 89%
§112 — Written description & definiteness56%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner John Robert Dakita Ewald

  • What is Examiner Ewald's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 79%, calculated from 24 disposed applications (those decided as allowed or abandoned). This figure reflects past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Examiner Ewald is assigned to one art unit (Art Unit 2199) in TC 2100.
  • How many applications has this examiner processed?
    The examiner's record includes 57 total applications, of which 19 were allowed, 5 were abandoned, and 24 were disposed. The remaining applications are pending.
  • Does the pooled allowance rate predict my application's outcome?
    No. The pooled rate is an historical aggregate across all art units and does not constitute a prediction of any specific application's fate. Individual outcomes vary.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner John Robert Dakita Ewald has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 57 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP