Examiner John Robert Dakita Ewald has allowed 19 of 24 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Patent Examiner John Robert Dakita Ewald maintains a public record across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's allowance rate, calculated from 24 disposed applications, stands at 79%. This means that of applications decided (allowed or abandoned), 79% were allowed. The examiner has processed a total of 57 applications, with 19 allowed, 5 abandoned, and 24 disposed. The remaining applications remain pending. This pooled record reflects the examiner's overall output and rates across all assigned art units.
This record pools all art units under Examiner Ewald's jurisdiction and presents aggregate figures. The allowance rate of 79% describes the past distribution of decided applications—allowed versus abandoned—and reflects historical output only. Aggregate figures do not constitute predictions of outcomes for any specific application. Individual art units may show different rates and activity levels; pooled data combines them into a single overall profile.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner John Robert Dakita Ewald has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 57 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP