LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JOIYA M CLOUD
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Joiya M Cloud

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 25 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Joiya M Cloud has allowed 7 of 25 decided applications (28%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

28% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Joiya M Cloud has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning one art unit. Across 25 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 7 and abandoned 18. The overall allowance rate is 28 percent. This figure describes only decided applications and does not include pending cases. The rate reflects the pooled record across the examiner's art-unit assignments and is a historical summary of outcomes, not a prediction regarding any individual application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all of the examiner's art units into a single allowance-rate figure. Aggregate statistics describe past outcomes across different subject areas and prosecution histories. An overall allowance rate is not a prediction for any specific application. Individual art units within TC 2100 may show different rates. The pooled figure provides a broad overview of the examiner's record across all assignments.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2144
25 APPS · 28% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
28% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION7 / 18 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION44.3 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY55.9 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Joiya M Cloud

  • What is Joiya M Cloud's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 28 percent, calculated from 7 allowed applications out of 25 disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This pooled record covers one art unit (Art Unit 2144) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does this allowance rate mean for my application?
    This rate is a summary of past outcomes only. It is not a prediction of the outcome in any specific application and does not account for the particular claims, arguments, or prior art in individual cases.
  • How many applications are included in this record?
    The record includes 25 disposed applications (7 allowed, 18 abandoned). Pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joiya M Cloud has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 25 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP