LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JONAH C KRIEGER
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jonah C Krieger

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 162 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Jonah C Krieger has allowed 142 of 162 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

88% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2136 · 88%AU 2133 · 87%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jonah C Krieger maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 162 decided applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 88%, reflecting 142 allowed applications against 20 abandoned filings. The allowance rate ranges from 87% to 88% across the examiner's art units. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's activity in art units 2133 and 2136 and describes the historical record only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units and reflects past dispositions. The overall allowance rate describes what occurred across decided applications historically and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate figures mask variation between individual art units; per-art-unit detail appears in a separate section. Allowance rates are correlational data and do not indicate causation or individual case prospects.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2136
147 APPS · 88% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.

88% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 60%
DISPOSITION129 / 18 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION16.3 moart unit avg 27.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY31.1 moart unit avg 43.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility31% · art unit 22%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)87%
§103 — Obviousness99% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness59%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW92%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW84%+8 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 65 decided applications with an interview and 82 without.

ART UNIT 2133
51 APPS · 87% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

87% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 82%
DISPOSITION13 / 2 / 36allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION15.5 moart unit avg 22.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37.2 moart unit avg 34.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility15% · art unit 22%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness98% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness66%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jonah C Krieger

  • What is Jonah C Krieger's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 88% over 162 decided applications (142 allowed, 20 abandoned), pooled across all art units in the public record.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Jonah C Krieger's record spans 2 art units: 2133 and 2136, both within TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary across art units?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 87% to 88% across the examiner's art units. Per-art-unit detail is available separately.
  • Is this allowance rate a prediction for my application?
    No. This figure describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jonah C Krieger has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 198 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP