Examiner Jonathan D Gibson

What the data says.

Jonathan D Gibson maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 420 total applications, 352 were allowed and 54 were abandoned, for a combined 406 disposed applications. The allowance rate on decided applications is 87%. This rate represents the examiner's pooled record across a single art unit (2113) and describes past outcomes on completed applications. The record does not indicate the status of pending applications or constitute a prediction for any specific filing.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates decisions across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate of 87% is calculated from allowed and abandoned applications, excluding pending cases. Aggregate figures describe historical performance and are correlational snapshots of past dispositions. They do not forecast the outcome of any individual application, which depends on claim language, prior art, and examiner analysis specific to that case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.

Questions about Examiner Jonathan D Gibson

• 01What is Jonathan D Gibson's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 87%, based on 352 allowed and 54 abandoned applications among 406 total decided applications.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  The examiner's public record spans one art unit: 2113, within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does this pooled allowance rate mean for my application?

  The pooled rate describes past outcomes on completed applications. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome, which depends on the claim scope, prior art, and examination of the particular case.
• 04How many applications has this examiner disposed?

  The examiner has disposed 406 applications: 352 allowed and 54 abandoned, out of 420 total applications on record.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.