Examiner Jonathan David Warner has allowed 20 of 26 decided applications (77%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jonathan David Warner maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 26 disposed applications, Warner allowed 20 and 6 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 77%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects outcomes on applications that have been decided; it does not characterize pending cases. The 77% figure is a historical summary of closed prosecutions and is not a prediction of any future application.
This record pools all applications across the examiner's art units into a single aggregate profile. The overall allowance rate of 77% describes the examiner's past record on decided applications only. Aggregate figures mask variation across different art units and technology areas. Historical allowance rates are correlational statistics and do not predict outcomes in any individual case. Review the per-art-unit detail for granular subject-matter and practice-specific patterns.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.
Based on 26 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jonathan David Warner has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 26 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP