LYNCH·LLP
Book a consultation →
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JONATHAN MICHAEL SKRZYCKI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jonathan Michael Skrzycki

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 235 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Jonathan Michael Skrzycki has allowed 159 of 235 decided applications (68%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

68% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2116 · 73%AU 2118 · 45%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jonathan Michael Skrzycki maintains a public record spanning 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 235 decided applications, his allowance rate is 68%. The pooled record reflects work across art units 2116 and 2118. Allowance rates within these art units range from 45% to 73%. A total of 267 applications appear in his record; 159 were allowed and 76 were abandoned. The figures presented describe his historical record only and are not predictions for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates Examiner Skrzycki's work across multiple art units within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate (68% of 235 decided applications) represents the combined historical record and does not isolate performance within any single art unit. Allowance rates vary across his art units (45% to 73%). Aggregate figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions of outcomes on individual cases. Art-unit-specific data appears in a separate section.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2116
225 APPS · 73% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines control or regulating systems.

73% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 78%
DISPOSITION140 / 53 / 32allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.1 moart unit avg 24.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY36.9 moart unit avg 37.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility55% · art unit 32%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)72%
§103 — Obviousness91% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness92%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW86%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW49%+37 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 125 decided applications with an interview and 68 without.

◈ ART UNIT 2118
42 APPS · 45% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
45% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 73%
DISPOSITION19 / 23 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19 moart unit avg 22.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY31.5 moart unit avg 36.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility46% · art unit 30%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)95%
§103 — Obviousness98% · art unit 82%
§112 — Written description & definiteness80%

Based on 42 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jonathan Michael Skrzycki

  • What is Jonathan Michael Skrzycki's overall allowance rate?
    His allowance rate across all art units is 68%, calculated from 235 decided applications (159 allowed, 76 abandoned). This figure describes his pooled historical record and is not a prediction for any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Examiner Skrzycki's public record spans 2 art units (2116 and 2118) in TC 2100.
  • Do allowance rates differ across his art units?
    Yes. Allowance rates across his art units range from 45% to 73%. Individual art-unit data is available in a separate section of this page.
  • What does the 68% allowance rate mean?
    Of 235 applications that received a final decision (allowed or abandoned), 68% were allowed. This pooled figure spans both art units and describes his record; it is not a prediction for pending or future applications.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jonathan Michael Skrzycki has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 267 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP