Examiner Jonathan R Plante has allowed 18 of 39 decided applications (46%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jonathan R Plante maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit. Over 39 disposed applications, Plante allowed 18 and abandoned 21, yielding an allowance rate of 46% across all decided matters. This figure represents the proportion of applications that received allowance among those with final disposition. The record reflects outcomes across the art units within his assignment and covers completed prosecution histories only.
A pooled examiner record aggregates all applications and dispositions across assigned art units into a single allowance-rate figure. This aggregate describes past outcomes and is correlational only—it is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled rates mask variation across individual art units and are appropriate for understanding an examiner's overall historical practice, not for forecasting results in any particular technology area or application type.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jonathan R Plante has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 39 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP