Examiner Jordan Scott Motter

What the data says.

Jordan Scott Motter maintains a public record across two art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The pooled record spans 57 total applications, of which 34 have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). Of those 34 decided applications, 27 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 79%. The record encompasses art units 2198 and 2199. This overall figure represents aggregated outcomes across both units and describes the examiner's historical record without bearing on any individual pending application.

How to read these numbers.

This record is pooled, aggregating outcomes across multiple art units within TC 2100. Pooled figures describe past dispositions and do not constitute predictions about specific applications. Because different art units handle distinct subject matter within the technology center, aggregate rates reflect a mix of examination patterns across those units. The allowance rate is computed from decided applications only—pending cases are excluded. Historical figures serve as background context only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines program control and execution.

Primarily examines software engineering, and program control and execution.

Questions about Examiner Jordan Scott Motter

• 01What is Jordan Scott Motter's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 79% based on 34 decided applications (27 allowed, 7 abandoned) pooled across both art units. This is a historical figure and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The record spans 2 art units: 2198 and 2199, both within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The figures presented are pooled across both units.
• 03What do these statistics measure?

  The allowance rate reflects the share of decided applications (allowed or abandoned) that were allowed. It is calculated from 34 disposed applications out of 57 total applications in the record. Pending applications are not included in the allowance rate calculation.
• 04Does this record predict my application's outcome?

  No. Historical allowance rates describe past dispositions and are not predictions of any specific application. Each application is examined individually based on the claims, specification, and prior art.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.