Examiner Jordany Nunez has allowed 349 of 572 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Jordany Nunez has a public record of 572 disposed applications across 5 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 349 were allowed and 223 were abandoned, yielding an overall allowance rate of 61%. The examiner's work spans art units 2145, 2171, 2175, 2177, and 2179. Allowance rates across these art units range from 27% to 93%, reflecting variation in outcomes by subject area within TC 2100.
This record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units, pooling different technology areas and examination contexts into a single figure. The 61% allowance rate describes past outcomes on 572 decided applications and does not predict results on any individual application. The range of 27% to 93% shows that allowance rates vary significantly by art unit; the pooled figure masks this variation and is not a substitute for art-unit-specific analysis.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 188 decided applications with an interview and 205 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 41 decided applications with an interview and 45 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 27 decided applications with an interview and 31 without.
Based on 9 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jordany Nunez has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 572 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP