LYNCH·LLP
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Josep Han

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 15 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION MAY 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Josep Han has allowed 6 of 15 decided applications (40%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

40% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Josep Han maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 57 total applications, 15 have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). Of those 15 decided applications, 6 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 40%. The examiner works within a single art unit (2122). This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications within that art unit and does not forecast results in any specific case.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications decided within the examiner's assigned art unit. The allowance rate (40% of 15 decided applications) describes past outcomes and reflects the examiner's historical record. Pooled figures do not vary by individual application characteristics and are not predictions of how any future application will be examined or decided. An aggregate rate describes the past, not the future.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2122
57 APPS · 40% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

40% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION6 / 9 / 42allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION36.8 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49.2 moart unit avg 39.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility86% · art unit 55%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness92% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness53%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Josep Han

  • What is Josep Han's overall allowance rate?
    40%, based on 6 allowed applications out of 15 disposed (decided) applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    One art unit (2122), within TC 2100.
  • How many total applications are in this examiner's record?
    57 total applications. Of those, 15 have been disposed (allowed or abandoned), and 9 have been abandoned. Remaining applications are still pending.
  • Does the allowance rate apply to my application?
    No. The pooled allowance rate describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Josep Han has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 57 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP