Examiner Joseph D Manoskey has allowed 1,018 of 1,110 decided applications (92%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Joseph D Manoskey maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1 art unit, he has disposed of 1,110 applications. Of those decided applications, 1,018 were allowed, yielding a 92% allowance rate. Ninety-two applications were abandoned. The record spans 1,138 total filings. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate allowance rate across all art units in which he has issued decisions.
This pooled record aggregates dispositions across all art units where this examiner has decided applications. The 92% allowance rate reflects the proportion of allowed applications among all decided cases—allowed plus abandoned—and describes the past record only. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes in any individual application. Art-unit-specific data, where available separately, may vary from the pooled aggregate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 295 decided applications with an interview and 815 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joseph D Manoskey has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,138 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP