LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JOSEPH D TORRES
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Joseph D Torres

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 1,842 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Joseph D Torres has allowed 1,474 of 1,842 decided applications (80%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

80% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2112 · 80%AU 2133 · 77%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Joseph D Torres has a public record spanning 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1,842 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 80%. The allowance rate ranges from 77% to 80% across these art units. This pooled record aggregates outcomes from multiple distinct art units and describes historical disposition data. The figures reflect decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and do not include pending filings.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's public record aggregates performance across 2 art units in TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate of 80% represents a historical average across different art-unit jurisdictions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Rates vary across art units, ranging from 77% to 80%. Aggregate figures describe past record; individual applications are examined independently.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2112
1,616 APPS · 80% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring, and error-correcting coding/decoding.

80% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 89%
DISPOSITION1274 / 309 / 33allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION21.5 moart unit avg 21.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY32.3 moart unit avg 31.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility37% · art unit 26%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)40%
§103 — Obviousness71% · art unit 55%
§112 — Written description & definiteness47%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW85%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW79%+6 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 407 decided applications with an interview and 1,176 without.

ART UNIT 2133
259 APPS · 77% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

77% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 82%
DISPOSITION200 / 59 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION26.4 moart unit avg 22.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY41 moart unit avg 34.8 mo
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW63%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW92%-29 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 129 decided applications with an interview and 130 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Joseph D Torres

  • What is Joseph D Torres's overall allowance rate?
    Across 1,842 disposed applications in TC 2100, his allowance rate is 80%.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    His public record spans 2 art units (2112 and 2133) in Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary across his art units?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 77% to 80% across these art units.
  • Does this pooled record predict my application's outcome?
    No. Pooled historical figures are not predictions of any specific application. Each application is examined independently.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joseph D Torres has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,875 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP