Examiner Joseph D Wong has allowed 8 of 44 decided applications (18%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Joseph D Wong maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Across 44 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 18%, with 8 allowed and 36 abandoned. The allowance rate ranges from 15% to 21% across his art units. This pooled figure aggregates his record across both units and reflects outcomes on applications that have been decided; it does not account for pending filings.
A pooled record aggregates results across multiple art units, smoothing variation that may exist within each unit. The overall allowance rate and art-unit range are historical summaries of decided cases and do not predict outcomes on any individual application. To understand how an examiner's practice may differ by subject matter within TC 2100, review the per-art-unit breakdown separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joseph D Wong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 44 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP