LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JOSEPH PATRICK MORRIS
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Joseph Patrick Morris

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 20 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Joseph Patrick Morris has allowed 8 of 20 decided applications (40%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

40% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Joseph Patrick Morris holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit. Across 68 total applications, 20 have been disposed—either allowed or abandoned. Of those 20 decided applications, 8 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 40%. Twelve applications were abandoned. This data reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across one art unit within TC 2100. Aggregate allowance rates describe historical outcomes on decided cases and are not predictions about any specific application. Individual art units within this technology center may have different profiles. The 40% rate shown here is a factual summary of past decisions and does not indicate the probability of allowance on any given filing.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2188
68 APPS · 40% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

40% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 67%
DISPOSITION8 / 12 / 48allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39.4 moart unit avg 26.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY47.7 moart unit avg 39.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility94% · art unit 54%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness98% · art unit 74%
§112 — Written description & definiteness89%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Joseph Patrick Morris

  • What is Joseph Patrick Morris's overall allowance rate?
    His allowance rate is 40%, calculated over 20 disposed applications (allowed plus abandoned). This rate is a record of past decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    The record covers one art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What does the allowance rate include and exclude?
    The allowance rate (40%) is the share of allowed applications among all decided applications. Pending applications are excluded. Of 68 total applications in the record, 20 have been disposed; 8 were allowed and 12 were abandoned.
  • What is Technology Center 2100?
    Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) is the technology center descriptor for this examiner's art unit. It covers patent applications in that subject area.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joseph Patrick Morris has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 68 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP