Examiner Joseph Patrick Morris has allowed 8 of 20 decided applications (40%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Joseph Patrick Morris holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit. Across 68 total applications, 20 have been disposed—either allowed or abandoned. Of those 20 decided applications, 8 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 40%. Twelve applications were abandoned. This data reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
This pooled record aggregates data across one art unit within TC 2100. Aggregate allowance rates describe historical outcomes on decided cases and are not predictions about any specific application. Individual art units within this technology center may have different profiles. The 40% rate shown here is a factual summary of past decisions and does not indicate the probability of allowance on any given filing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joseph Patrick Morris has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 68 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP