Examiner Joshua A Lohn has allowed 400 of 464 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Joshua A Lohn maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 464 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 86%, with 400 applications allowed and 64 abandoned. This figure reflects decisions reached on applications in his pooled record and does not account for pending applications. The record spans multiple art units, aggregating outcomes across different subject areas within TC 2100.
A pooled record combines outcomes across multiple art units, masking variation within each unit. The 86% allowance rate describes past dispositions across all assigned art units and is a historical aggregate, not a prediction for any individual application. Detailed breakdowns by art unit are available separately. Aggregate figures describe what occurred; they do not forecast outcomes in specific cases or indicate how any particular application will be examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 52 decided applications with an interview and 409 without.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joshua A Lohn has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 464 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP