LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JOSHUA BULLOCK
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Joshua Bullock

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 749 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Joshua Bullock has allowed 620 of 749 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

83% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2153 · 91%AU 2162 · 71%AU 2169 · 50%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Joshua Bullock's public record spans 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 749 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 83%. This figure represents allowed and abandoned applications as a share of decided cases, excluding pending filings. The allowance rate ranges from 71% to 91% across these art units, reflecting variation in the examiner's record by subject area. The pooled statistic aggregates applications across all three art units and describes historical outcomes only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines data from multiple art units into a single aggregate figure. The overall allowance rate is a historical summary and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Variation across art units—shown in the range—reflects differences in subject matter and application complexity. Pooled figures are descriptive of past dispositions and are not predictive tools for individual cases.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2153
478 APPS · 91% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

91% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION396 / 38 / 44allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.6 moart unit avg 27.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY34.6 moart unit avg 41.6 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility44% · art unit 54%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)73%
§103 — Obviousness41% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness8%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW94%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW89%+5 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 182 decided applications with an interview and 252 without.

ART UNIT 2162
313 APPS · 71% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

71% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 66%
DISPOSITION223 / 90 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.5 moart unit avg 23.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY45.5 moart unit avg 41.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility36% · art unit 56%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)62%
§103 — Obviousness70% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness24%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW86%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW62%+24 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 116 decided applications with an interview and 197 without.

ART UNIT 2169
2 APPS · 50% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

50% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 47%
DISPOSITION1 / 1 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION30.3 moart unit avg 24.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY73.8 moart unit avg 40 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Joshua Bullock

  • What is Joshua Bullock's overall allowance rate?
    83% across 749 disposed applications, pooled across all art units. This is the share of allowed and abandoned applications as a portion of all decided cases.
  • How many art units does Joshua Bullock work in?
    3 art units (2153, 2162, 2169) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate vary across art units?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 71% to 91% across the examiner's art units, reflecting differences in subject area and application patterns.
  • Does this record predict the outcome of my application?
    No. This is a historical summary of past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joshua Bullock has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 793 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP