Examiner Joshua D Campbell has allowed 65 of 127 decided applications (51%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Joshua D Campbell maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 127 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 51%, with 65 allowed and 62 abandoned. This allowance rate reflects decisions on applications that have been resolved; it does not account for pending filings. The pooled figure spans art units 2178 and 2179 and represents the examiner's aggregate record across these art units.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units into a single allowance figure. This aggregate rate describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction about any specific application. Allowance rate measures decided cases only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending applications. Pooled data masks variation that may exist within individual art units, which are detailed separately elsewhere on this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 48 decided applications with an interview and 76 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joshua D Campbell has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 127 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP