Examiner Joshua Eric Jensen has allowed 51 of 118 decided applications (43%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Joshua Eric Jensen maintains a pooled allowance rate of 43% across 118 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His record spans 2 art units. Among those art units, allowance rates range from 33% to 48%. The 43% figure reflects applications that received final decisions—either allowed or abandoned—and does not include pending matters. This pooled rate aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units within TC 2100.
A pooled record combines an examiner's statistics across all their assigned art units into a single aggregate. The overall allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The range of allowance rates across art units illustrates variation in the examiner's record by subject matter within TC 2100. These figures are historical and correlational only; they reflect what has occurred, not what will occur in any future case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 49 decided applications with an interview and 33 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Based on 36 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joshua Eric Jensen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 118 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP