Examiner Joshua P Lottich has allowed 900 of 975 decided applications (92%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Joshua P Lottich maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 975 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 92%, calculated from 900 allowed and 75 abandoned applications. The record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the historical allowance rate across decided cases and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application. The record reflects past dispositions only.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across one art unit within TC 2100. Aggregate allowance rates describe historical performance and are not predictions of outcomes in specific applications. Pooled figures mask variation within and across art units. The data presented here reflects past dispositions and serves as context for understanding the examiner's record, not as a basis for estimating any particular application's path.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 240 decided applications with an interview and 735 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Joshua P Lottich has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,004 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP