Examiner Jude Jean Gilles has allowed 98 of 162 decided applications (60%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jude Jean Gilles maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 162 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 98 and abandoned 64, yielding an allowance rate of 60% over the decided count. The examiner operates within one art unit (2143). This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications within that unit over the period covered by the public database. The allowance rate of 60% represents the share of decided applications that resulted in allowance.
A pooled record aggregates all applications across an examiner's assigned art units into a single set of figures. The overall allowance rate reflects historical outcomes on decided applications and describes past record only—it is not a prediction of the result on any specific pending application. Comparing this rate to art-unit averages or technology-center baselines provides context, but individual application outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution responses.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 31 decided applications with an interview and 131 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jude Jean Gilles has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 162 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP