LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JUE WANG LOUIE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Jue Wang Louie

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 392 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2023
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Jue Wang Louie has allowed 189 of 392 decided applications (48%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

48% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2193 · 43%AU 2121 · 65%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Jue Wang Louie maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 392 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 189 and abandoned 203, for an overall allowance rate of 48%. The record spans art units 2121 and 2193. Allowance rates across these art units range from 43% to 65%, reflecting variation in the examiner's disposition patterns within TC 2100. These figures describe the examiner's past decisions on decided applications and are not predictive of any future case.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record pools decisions across multiple art units within TC 2100, presenting an aggregate allowance rate. A pooled figure reflects the combined history across different subject areas and application volumes handled by the examiner. The 48% overall rate describes past dispositions—both allowances and abandonments—among 392 decided applications. This aggregate is not a prediction of outcome on any specific application, nor does it indicate how the examiner will treat individual cases.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2193
300 APPS · 43% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.

43% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 70%
DISPOSITION129 / 171 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION36.1 moart unit avg 30.6 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY66.8 moart unit avg 44 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility52% · art unit 54%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)48%
§103 — Obviousness93% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness59%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW65%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW20%+45 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 153 decided applications with an interview and 147 without.

ART UNIT 2121
92 APPS · 65% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

65% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION60 / 32 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION29.8 moart unit avg 27 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49.7 moart unit avg 39.9 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility57% · art unit 46%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)89%
§103 — Obviousness92% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness67%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW68%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW57%+11 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 69 decided applications with an interview and 23 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Jue Wang Louie

  • What is Jue Wang Louie's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner allowed 189 of 392 disposed applications, for an allowance rate of 48%.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    The record spans two art units (2121 and 2193) within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What is the range of allowance rates across the examiner's art units?
    Allowance rates range from 43% to 65% across the examiner's art units, reflecting variation in disposition patterns within TC 2100.
  • Does this allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. This figure describes the examiner's past record on decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jue Wang Louie has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 392 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP