Examiner Julian Chang

What the data says.

Julian Chang's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across one art unit. Over 44 disposed applications, Chang allowed 17 and abandoned 27, yielding an allowance rate of 39%. This rate reflects decisions on applications that reached final disposition; 44 applications were resolved in total. The record aggregates outcomes across the examiner's assigned art unit(s) and provides a historical snapshot of allowance and abandonment outcomes without indicating the outcome of any pending or future application.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all disposed applications across the examiner's art unit assignments in TC 2100. The 39% allowance rate describes past decisions and is not a prediction of outcomes in any specific case. Allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only—applications that received either an allowance or an abandonment—and excludes pending matters. Aggregate statistics reflect historical data and do not forecast prosecution results.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Julian Chang

• 01What is Julian Chang's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 39%, based on 44 disposed applications—17 allowed and 27 abandoned.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record covers one art unit (2152) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the allowance rate tell me about my application?

  The allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of the outcome in any specific case. Past allowance rates do not forecast decisions on pending or future applications.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.