Examiner Julian Scott Mendel has allowed 30 of 37 decided applications (81%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Julian Scott Mendel maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 75 total applications, 37 have been disposed (decided). Of those 37 decided applications, 30 were allowed and 7 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 81% over the disposed count. The examiner's record spans a single art unit (2133). This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate history and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across one art unit. The 81% allowance rate describes the examiner's past decisions on 37 disposed applications and reflects historical performance, not a forecast of any specific case. Pooled figures smooth variation across art units but do not indicate how any particular application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Julian Scott Mendel has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 75 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP