Examiner Jun Kwon

What the data says.

Examiner Jun Kwon maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, 75 applications have been disposed. Of those decided applications, 31 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 41 percent. In the same period, 44 applications were abandoned. A total of 118 applications appear in the examiner's record. These figures represent the examiner's pooled history and describe outcomes already concluded, not predictions about pending or future applications.

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates all art units under which Examiner Kwon has examined. The allowance rate of 41 percent is calculated from disposed (decided) applications only—allowed and abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Because this is a pooled record across one art unit, the figures describe past outcomes in aggregate and are not a forecast of any individual application's outcome. Allowance rates vary by art unit, application, and prosecution path.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Jun Kwon

• 01What is Examiner Jun Kwon's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 41 percent, based on 31 allowed applications among 75 disposed applications in Examiner Kwon's pooled record.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record covers one art unit (Art Unit 2127) in Technology Center 2100.
• 03What do these figures represent?

  The figures describe Examiner Kwon's completed examinations across all art units. They are a historical summary and are not a prediction of any pending or future application's outcome.
• 04Why is the allowance rate based on disposed applications, not total applications?

  Allowance rate measures decided cases (allowed plus abandoned). Pending applications have no final decision yet, so they are excluded from the calculation. Total applications include all three categories.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.