Examiner Junchun Wu has allowed 472 of 557 decided applications (85%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Junchun Wu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 557 disposed applications, 472 were allowed and 85 were abandoned, corresponding to an 85% allowance rate. This rate reflects the examiner's record on all decided cases within the pooled art unit. The data describes the examiner's historical disposition of applications and does not constitute a prediction of any individual application's outcome.
This record aggregates all disposed applications across the examiner's assigned art units into a single pooled allowance rate. The 85% figure describes past decisions and is not a forecast for any specific application. Pooled rates combine different art units and subject areas; individual applications may experience different patterns. Historical statistics describe what occurred, not what will occur in future cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 136 decided applications with an interview and 421 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Junchun Wu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 557 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP