Examiner Justin King

What the data says.

Examiner Justin King's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across one art unit. Over 56 disposed applications, King issued 45 allowances and 11 abandonments, yielding an allowance rate of 80%. This figure represents the percentage of decided applications in the examiner's pooled record. The record aggregates examination activity across the art unit(s) listed and reflects outcomes on applications that reached final disposition. Allowance rates describe past decisions and are not predictive of outcomes on any individual application.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled examiner record combines data across multiple art units into a single aggregate profile. The allowance rate reflects the share of decided applications that were allowed, excluding pending cases. Because this record spans multiple art units, the aggregate figures describe the examiner's overall history and do not necessarily apply uniformly to any specific art unit or application. Pooled rates are historical summaries, not predictions about future examination outcomes.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Questions about Examiner Justin King

• 01What is Justin King's allowance rate?

  Over 56 disposed applications, Examiner King issued 45 allowances and 11 abandonments, for an allowance rate of 80%.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record spans one art unit in TC 2100.
• 03Does the allowance rate apply to my application?

  No. The allowance rate is a historical aggregate of decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Prosecution results vary based on claim language, prior art, and examination circumstances.
• 04What is the difference between disposed and total applications?

  Disposed applications are those that reached final outcome (allowed or abandoned). Total applications may include pending cases. The allowance rate is calculated only from disposed applications.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.