LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/JUSTIN R KNAPP
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Justin R Knapp

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 794 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Justin R Knapp has allowed 673 of 794 decided applications (85%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

85% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2112 · 86%AU 2182 · 72%AU 2183 · 100%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Justin R Knapp has a public record spanning 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 794 disposed applications, he has allowed 673, yielding an overall allowance rate of 85%. The allowance rate ranges from 72% to 86% across his art units. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes from multiple art units and reflects historical data on applications that reached final disposition—either allowed or abandoned—excluding applications still pending.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates an examiner's performance across multiple art units into a single allowance-rate figure. This aggregate describes past outcomes and is a historical measure, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art units may have different allowance rates; the range shown reflects that variation. The pooled allowance rate is useful context for understanding an examiner's overall profile, but does not forecast the result in any particular case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2112
783 APPS · 86% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring, and error-correcting coding/decoding.

86% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 89%
DISPOSITION639 / 108 / 36allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION18.9 moart unit avg 21.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY29.4 moart unit avg 31.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility28% · art unit 26%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)47%
§103 — Obviousness33% · art unit 55%
§112 — Written description & definiteness63%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW91%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW85%+6 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 105 decided applications with an interview and 642 without.

ART UNIT 2182
46 APPS · 72% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.

72% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION33 / 13 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION23.7 moart unit avg 24.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY32.4 moart unit avg 37.3 mo
ART UNIT 2183
1 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines program control and execution.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION1 / 0 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20 moart unit avg 25 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY25.1 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Justin R Knapp

  • What is Justin R Knapp's overall allowance rate?
    85% across 794 disposed applications pooled from all his art units.
  • How many art units does he cover?
    3 art units: 2112, 2182, and 2183, all within TC 2100.
  • Does his allowance rate vary by art unit?
    Yes. The allowance rate ranges from 72% to 86% across the art units. The pooled 85% is an aggregate of these different rates.
  • Is the pooled allowance rate a prediction for my application?
    No. The pooled rate is a historical summary of decided applications. It does not predict the outcome of any specific application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Justin R Knapp has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 830 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP