Examiner Justin S Lee has allowed 269 of 369 decided applications (73%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Justin S Lee has a public record spanning 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 369 disposed applications, 269 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 73%. The allowance rate ranges from 59% to 82% across these art units. This pooled figure represents all decided cases—both allowances and abandonments—and does not include pending applications. The record reflects outcomes across multiple subject areas within TC 2100.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units and reflects historical dispositions, not predictions about any specific application. The overall allowance rate of 73% describes past decisions on 369 disposed cases. The range (59% to 82%) shows variation among the examiner's individual art units. These figures are correlational summaries of prior work and do not indicate how any given application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 140 decided applications with an interview and 88 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 75 decided applications with an interview and 66 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Justin S Lee has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 369 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP