Examiner Justin T Darrow has allowed 55 of 66 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Justin T Darrow has disposed of 66 applications across Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 55 were allowed and 11 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 83%. This pooled record spans a single art unit. The figures reflect outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition and do not include pending cases. The allowance rate is a historical measure of past decisions and is not a prediction for any specific application.
This examiner's record is pooled across all art units under their assignment. The aggregated allowance rate describes the proportion of decided applications that were allowed versus abandoned over the full public record. Pooled figures blend outcomes across different subject areas and cannot predict the outcome of any individual case. For art-unit-specific rates and details, consult the separate art-unit breakdown section.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Justin T Darrow has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 66 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP