Examiner Jyoti Mehta has allowed 244 of 331 decided applications (74%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Jyoti Mehta maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 331 disposed applications, 244 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 74%. The allowance rate ranges from 71% to 78% across these art units. The examiner's pooled record reflects activity spanning two distinct art-unit categories within TC 2100, with variation in allowance rates between them. This aggregate figure represents historical disposition data and does not characterize any single pending application.
A pooled record aggregates allowance rates across multiple art units, presenting a composite view of an examiner's historical decisions. The 74% allowance rate describes applications already decided—not a forecast for future filings. The range (71% to 78%) shows that individual art units within TC 2100 may have differed in allowance rates; the aggregate masks this variation. Pooled statistics describe past performance only and carry no predictive force for any particular case or applicant.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 163 decided applications with an interview and 45 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 74 decided applications with an interview and 49 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Jyoti Mehta has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 339 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP