LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/KAITLYN HUNG PHAM
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Kaitlyn Hung Pham

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 5 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Kaitlyn Hung Pham has allowed 5 of 5 decided applications (100%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

100% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Kaitlyn Hung Pham maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a single art unit, the examiner has disposed of 5 applications. The allowance rate stands at 100%, meaning all 5 decided applications were allowed. The record spans 34 total applications, of which 0 have been abandoned. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across the examiner's assigned art unit and represents the examiner's historical record; it is not a prediction for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates the examiner's performance across one art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate is computed as a percentage of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. Pooled rates describe past outcomes and do not predict results on individual applications. Different art units may exhibit distinct examination patterns; this figure reflects the combined historical record only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2133
34 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 82%
DISPOSITION5 / 0 / 29allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION17 moart unit avg 22.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY20.8 moart unit avg 34.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility36% · art unit 22%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)45%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness59%

Based on 34 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Kaitlyn Hung Pham

  • What is Examiner Pham's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 100% across 5 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). This is the percentage of allowed applications among all decided cases and does not include pending applications.
  • How many art units does Examiner Pham cover?
    The examiner's public record spans 1 art unit (Art Unit 2133) within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is the share of allowed applications among all decided (allowed or abandoned) applications. It describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction for any specific application.
  • How many total applications are in this record?
    The examiner has 34 total applications on file, of which 5 have been disposed (decided as allowed or abandoned). The remainder are pending.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kaitlyn Hung Pham has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 34 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP