LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/KAKALI CHAKI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Kakali Chaki

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 70 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Kakali Chaki has allowed 16 of 70 decided applications (23%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

23% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2122 · 19%AU 2193 · 100%AU 2124 · 100%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Kakali Chaki maintains a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 103 total applications, 70 have been disposed of (decided). Of those 70 disposed applications, 16 were allowed and 54 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 23% across the examiner's pooled record. This allowance rate reflects decisions made to date and describes the examiner's historical record in the technology center.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates Examiner Chaki's work across three separate art units. The 23% allowance rate is calculated from all decided applications across those units combined and represents the examiner's historical record. Aggregate figures describe what has occurred in the past; they are not predictions about the outcome of any specific pending or future application. Individual art units may show different patterns.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2122
100 APPS · 19% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

19% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION13 / 54 / 33allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION31.7 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY34.2 moart unit avg 39.3 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility67% · art unit 55%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)82%
§103 — Obviousness86% · art unit 83%
§112 — Written description & definiteness65%
ART UNIT 2193
2 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 70%
DISPOSITION2 / 0 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION29.3 moart unit avg 30.6 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY38.2 moart unit avg 44 mo
ART UNIT 2124
1 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 64%
DISPOSITION1 / 0 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION4.9 moart unit avg 28.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY18.5 moart unit avg 41.8 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Kakali Chaki

  • What is Examiner Kakali Chaki's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 23%, calculated from 16 allowed applications out of 70 disposed (decided) applications across all art units in the public record.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Examiner Chaki works across three art units (2122, 2124, 2193) within TC 2100. The pooled figures shown here combine all three.
  • What does the 23% allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is a historical measure: of all applications decided (allowed or abandoned) in the examiner's record, 23% were allowed. It is not a prediction for any pending application.
  • Does this record apply to my specific application?
    This pooled record is a summary of past decisions and does not predict outcomes for any individual application. Decisions depend on the merits of each application under the patent statutes.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kakali Chaki has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 103 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP