Examiner Kalpit Parikh has allowed 538 of 664 decided applications (81%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Kalpit Parikh maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 664 disposed applications, 538 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 81%. The examiner's record spans multiple art units within TC 2100, and allowance rates across these units range from 58% to 90%. This pooled figure represents the overall pattern of decisions in decided cases and does not forecast outcomes in any individual application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across multiple art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate is computed from decided applications only—allowed and abandoned cases—and excludes pending filings. The pooled rate and the range across art units are historical summaries of past dispositions. These figures describe what occurred in the examiner's record and are not predictions about future applications or any specific case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 204 decided applications with an interview and 278 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 50 decided applications with an interview and 132 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kalpit Parikh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 694 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP