Examiner Kamal B Divecha

What the data says.

Examiner Kamal B Divecha maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 85 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 10 and abandoned 75, yielding a 12% allowance rate. The examiner's practice spans one art unit. This allowance rate reflects the proportion of decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and does not include pending matters. The record represents the examiner's aggregated history across all assigned art units and is descriptive of past dispositions only.

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates Examiner Divecha's record across all art units in a single technology center. The allowance rate (12%) is computed from disposed applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending filings. Pooled figures describe the examiner's historical record and are correlational data, not predictive of any specific application's outcome. Individual art-unit breakdowns, when available, appear in separate sections.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Kamal B Divecha

• 01What is Examiner Divecha's allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 12%, based on 10 allowed applications out of 85 total disposed applications in the examiner's pooled record.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record covers one art unit (Art Unit 2151) in Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the allowance rate mean?

  The allowance rate is the percentage of applications that were allowed, calculated only from decided matters (allowed plus abandoned). It does not include pending applications and is historical data, not a prediction for any specific case.
• 04How many applications has the examiner decided?

  The examiner has disposed of 85 applications: 10 allowed and 75 abandoned.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.