Examiner Kambiz Zand has allowed 118 of 136 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kambiz Zand maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 136 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 87%. This figure reflects 118 allowed applications and 18 abandoned applications. The record aggregates activity across multiple art units within TC 2100, providing a pooled view of dispositions over the examiner's tenure in this technology center. The allowance rate describes historical outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application's prosecution.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate reported here (87%) combines allowed and abandoned applications across different art-unit classifications within TC 2100. This aggregate figure describes past dispositions only and does not predict outcomes in any particular application. Different art units may show distinct patterns; this pooled view presents the combined record across the examiner's assignments in the technology center.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 110 without.
Primarily examines network security, and computer and data security.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kambiz Zand has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 136 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP