Examiner Kamini B Patel has allowed 1,036 of 1,181 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Kamini B Patel maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1,219 total applications, 1,036 were allowed and 145 were abandoned, yielding 1,181 decided applications. The allowance rate stands at 88% of disposed applications. This record spans a single art unit, providing a pooled view of examination activity in this technology center. The figures reflect historical outcomes on decided cases and do not constitute predictions regarding pending or future applications.
This examiner's pooled record aggregates outcomes across one art unit within TC 2100. The 88% allowance rate describes the ratio of allowed to decided (allowed plus abandoned) applications in the historical record. Pooled figures reflect past dispositions and are descriptive only—they do not forecast outcomes in any individual application, nor do they account for differences in application complexity, prior art, or claim scope.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 433 decided applications with an interview and 748 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kamini B Patel has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,219 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP