Examiner Kamran Afshar has allowed 27 of 67 decided applications (40%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kamran Afshar maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 87 total applications, 67 have been disposed of (decided). Of those 67 decided applications, 27 were allowed and 40 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 40%. This record spans a single art unit (2125). The figures reflect the examiner's pooled historical performance and do not constitute a prediction of outcomes in any specific application.
This profile aggregates Kamran Afshar's record across one art unit within TC 2100. Pooled figures merge data from all art units under the examiner's name and describe past dispositions only. The 40% allowance rate is calculated from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. Aggregate statistics characterize historical volume and decisions; they are not predictions or indicators of how any individual application will be handled.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 25 decided applications with an interview and 42 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kamran Afshar has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 87 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP