Examiner Karen C Tang

What the data says.

Karen C Tang holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across her pooled record, 60 applications have been disposed. Of those decided applications, 20 were allowed and 40 were abandoned, resulting in an allowance rate of 33%. This figure reflects outcomes across a single art unit. The allowance rate is a summary of past dispositions and does not indicate the outcome of any pending or future application.

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record spans one art unit and is presented as a pooled aggregate. Pooled figures combine all decisions across assigned art units and describe the historical record only. An aggregate allowance rate describes past outcomes across different application types and circumstances within TC 2100. Aggregate figures are not predictions about individual applications and do not account for variations by claim scope, prosecution history, or other case-specific factors.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Karen C Tang

• 01What is Karen C Tang's overall allowance rate?

  33% across 60 disposed applications in her pooled record.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  One art unit (2151) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What do these figures represent?

  A summary of past decisions pooled across all assigned art units. They describe historical outcomes, not predictions of any specific application's outcome.
• 04Does the allowance rate apply to my application?

  No. The pooled rate reflects past aggregate results and is not a prediction of any individual application's disposition.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.