Examiner Kari L Schmidt has allowed 3 of 20 decided applications (15%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Kari L Schmidt maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 20 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 3 and abandoned 17. The allowance rate stands at 15% over this decided pool. The record spans a single art unit, consolidating the examiner's activity in one classification area. These figures represent the examiner's historical output and are not predictions of outcomes in any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates examination activity within TC 2100 across one art unit. The allowance rate of 15% describes past dispositions—allowed and abandoned applications combined—and reflects the examiner's historical pattern. Aggregate figures describe what has occurred, not what will occur in any specific pending or future application. Individual case outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kari L Schmidt has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 20 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP