LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/KARI L SCHMIDT
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Kari L Schmidt

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 20 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Kari L Schmidt has allowed 3 of 20 decided applications (15%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

15% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Kari L Schmidt maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 20 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 3 and abandoned 17. The allowance rate stands at 15% over this decided pool. The record spans a single art unit, consolidating the examiner's activity in one classification area. These figures represent the examiner's historical output and are not predictions of outcomes in any individual application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates examination activity within TC 2100 across one art unit. The allowance rate of 15% describes past dispositions—allowed and abandoned applications combined—and reflects the examiner's historical pattern. Aggregate figures describe what has occurred, not what will occur in any specific pending or future application. Individual case outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2139
20 APPS · 15% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

15% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 65%
DISPOSITION3 / 17 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION35.6 moart unit avg 24 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY45.4 moart unit avg 37.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Kari L Schmidt

  • What is Examiner Schmidt's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 15%, based on 3 allowed applications out of 20 total disposed applications in the examiner's record.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Examiner Schmidt's public record spans one art unit (2139) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the 15% allowance rate mean for my application?
    The 15% figure is the examiner's historical allowance rate and describes past outcomes. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many applications has this examiner disposed of?
    The examiner has disposed of 20 applications: 3 allowed and 17 abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kari L Schmidt has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 20 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP