Examiner Karina Levitian has allowed 25 of 54 decided applications (46%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Karina Levitian maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 54 disposed applications, she allowed 25 and abandoned 29, yielding an allowance rate of 46%. Her record spans a single art unit (2165). This pooled figure describes her historical dispositions and does not project outcomes for any individual application. The 46% allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications in her aggregate record.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate shown here is computed from all decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in her public history and represents past dispositions only. Pooled figures do not account for variations between individual art units and are not predictions of how any specific application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 35 decided applications with an interview and 19 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Karina Levitian has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 54 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP