Examiner Katherine Y Lin has allowed 397 of 429 decided applications (93%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Katherine Y Lin maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 467 total applications, 397 were allowed and 32 were abandoned, yielding 429 disposed applications. The allowance rate is 93% over those decided cases. The examiner's work spans one art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across applications in computer architecture, software, and information security examined over the period covered by public USPTO data.
This profile aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across their assigned art unit(s). The allowance rate of 93% describes the examiner's historical decided caseload and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation within art units and do not indicate how any single case will be handled. Individual application results depend on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 224 decided applications with an interview and 205 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Katherine Y Lin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 467 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP