Examiner Kaushikkumar M Patel has allowed 827 of 1,007 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kaushikkumar M Patel maintains a public record across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,007 disposed applications, the examiner issued allowances in 827 cases, yielding an 82% allowance rate. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 73% to 87%. This pooled record reflects decisions across multiple subject-matter areas within TC 2100 and does not represent performance on any single application or art unit in isolation.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across 3 separate art units. The overall 82% allowance rate is a historical summary of decided cases and reflects past dispositions only. Pooled figures mask variation among individual art units; the range of 73% to 87% indicates that allowance rates differ depending on which art unit examines a given application. These statistics are correlational records of past decisions and are not predictions of outcomes in any specific pending case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 157 decided applications with an interview and 427 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 45 decided applications with an interview and 199 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 42 decided applications with an interview and 137 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kaushikkumar M Patel has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,031 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP