Examiner Kaveh Abrishamkar has allowed 65 of 109 decided applications (60%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Kaveh Abrishamkar's public record covers 109 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 65 were allowed and 44 were abandoned, for an allowance rate of 60%. The examiner works within a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications decided during the period covered by the public data; it describes past decisions and does not predict outcomes in any future or pending application.
This record aggregates examiner decisions across a single art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 60% is calculated from all disposed (decided) applications—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending filings. Pooled figures describe the examiner's historical record and are correlational in nature. They are not predictions of any specific application's outcome and do not account for differences in application complexity, claim scope, or examiner assignment timing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 46 decided applications with an interview and 63 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kaveh Abrishamkar has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 109 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP