Examiner Kayo Lisa Rusin has allowed 32 of 34 decided applications (94%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Kayo Lisa Rusin maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 54 total applications, 32 have been allowed and 2 abandoned, yielding 34 disposed applications. The allowance rate on the decided applications is 94%. This figure represents the proportion of allowed applications among all decided cases in the examiner's pooled record and does not include pending applications.
This pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units within TC 2100, combining different application categories into a single allowance rate. The 94% figure describes the examiner's historical record on decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask individual art-unit variation; detailed breakdowns by art unit appear separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kayo Lisa Rusin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 54 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP