LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/KENNETH R COULTER
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Kenneth R Coulter

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 163 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Kenneth R Coulter has allowed 110 of 163 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

67% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2141 · 66%AU 2154 · 100%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Kenneth R Coulter has a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 163 disposed applications, 110 were allowed and 53 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 67%. This figure reflects the proportion of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's pooled record. The record spans multiple art units within TC 2100, aggregating examination activity across different subject-matter groups. These figures describe past dispositions and do not constitute predictions about any particular application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units, producing an overall allowance rate that represents the examiner's combined history. The 67% allowance rate reflects 110 allowed applications out of 163 total decided cases. Because this figure pools different art units, it does not isolate performance in any single area. Aggregate historical rates are descriptions of past record only and are not predictions of outcomes on individual applications.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2141
157 APPS · 66% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

66% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION104 / 53 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION31.9 moart unit avg 28.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY48.1 moart unit avg 47.1 mo
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW58%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW69%-11 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 40 decided applications with an interview and 117 without.

ART UNIT 2154
6 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION6 / 0 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION8 moart unit avg 27.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY14.8 moart unit avg 41.9 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Kenneth R Coulter

  • What is Kenneth R Coulter's overall allowance rate?
    67%, based on 110 allowed applications out of 163 disposed (decided) applications in the pooled record across all art units.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    2 art units (2141 and 2154) within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What does the pooled allowance rate mean?
    The pooled rate aggregates allowed and abandoned applications across all art units the examiner handles. It describes historical dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many applications total has this examiner decided?
    163 applications have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). 110 were allowed and 53 were abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kenneth R Coulter has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 163 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP