Examiner Kenneth R Coulter has allowed 110 of 163 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kenneth R Coulter has a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 163 disposed applications, 110 were allowed and 53 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 67%. This figure reflects the proportion of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's pooled record. The record spans multiple art units within TC 2100, aggregating examination activity across different subject-matter groups. These figures describe past dispositions and do not constitute predictions about any particular application.
A pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units, producing an overall allowance rate that represents the examiner's combined history. The 67% allowance rate reflects 110 allowed applications out of 163 total decided cases. Because this figure pools different art units, it does not isolate performance in any single area. Aggregate historical rates are descriptions of past record only and are not predictions of outcomes on individual applications.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 40 decided applications with an interview and 117 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kenneth R Coulter has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 163 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP