Examiner Kenny Nguyen has allowed 107 of 198 decided applications (54%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Kenny Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 240 total applications, 198 have been disposed (decided). Of those 198 disposed applications, 107 were allowed and 91 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 54%. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all cases handled in TC 2100 and describes the examiner's historical allowance rate without predicting outcomes in any specific application.
This record aggregates all disposed applications across the examiner's assigned art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 54% allowance rate is calculated from decided cases only—pending applications are excluded. A pooled, cross-art-unit record presents historical data; it does not indicate how any individual application will be examined or decided. Aggregate figures describe past outcomes and serve as background context only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 111 decided applications with an interview and 87 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Kenny Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 240 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP