Examiner Keshab R Pandey has allowed 429 of 478 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Keshab R Pandey maintains a public record spanning 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 478 decided applications, the examiner's pooled allowance rate stands at 90%, with 429 applications allowed and 49 abandoned. The allowance rate across individual art units ranges from 77% to 96%, reflecting variation in outcomes within this technology center. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units and represents historical outcomes only.
A pooled record combines data across multiple art units into a single aggregate profile. The overall allowance rate of 90% reflects decisions rendered across all assigned art units and describes what has occurred, not what will occur in any future application. Individual art units may show different allowance rates; the range of 77% to 96% illustrates this variation. Pooled figures are descriptive of past record and are not predictions for specific cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 104 decided applications with an interview and 183 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 31 decided applications with an interview and 86 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 35 decided applications with an interview and 39 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Keshab R Pandey has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 503 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP