Examiner Kevin R Schubert

What the data says.

Kevin R Schubert maintains a public record across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 41 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 20%, with 8 allowed and 33 abandoned. The allowance rate reflects the ratio of decided cases only—allowed plus abandoned—and does not represent a share of all filings. This pooled record aggregates examination activity across his assigned art unit(s) and describes his past record without prediction of any specific application outcome.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates examination activity across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate and application counts are historical figures describing decisions already made. Pooled data combines different art units and subject matter into a single aggregate, and these figures describe the past record only—they are not predictions about any specific application or art unit. Individual art-unit records may differ from the pooled rate.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Kevin R Schubert

• 01What is Kevin R Schubert's overall allowance rate?

  His allowance rate is 20%, based on 41 disposed (decided) applications: 8 allowed and 33 abandoned.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  The record covers one art unit (2137) in Technology Center 2100.
• 03Does the pooled allowance rate predict outcomes in my application?

  No. The pooled rate describes past decisions across all of the examiner's assigned art units and is not a prediction of any specific application. Actual outcomes depend on application facts and prosecution details.
• 04What is the subject matter of this examiner's work?

  The examiner works in TC 2100, which covers Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.